To the Authorities

President of the Bar Association of San Isidro. — Antonio E. Carabio
President of the Bar Association of the Federal Capital. — Jorge G. Rizzo
Minister of Justice and Security of the Province of Buenos Aires. — Ricardo Casal
Minister of Justice and Human Rights, Presidency of the Nation. — Julio Alak

Most respectfully:

I am pleased to address you, in my capacity as an attorney, registered at T° XXXII F° 204 of the C.A.S.I., in compliance with articles 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 of the Code of Professional Ethics and Art. 47 of Law 5177, in order to inform you regarding the possible commission of certain acts and conduct in which public order has a significant interest and others that specifically relate to the professional technical capacity required to hold public office and practice law, of which I have become aware during my professional practice, linked to the Administration of Justice of the Province of Buenos Aires and National State Agencies:

I.- Accompanying Documentation

The documentation attached herein (accompanied in simple copy and on a CDROM in .pdf format), would allow to make known various facts that could undermine legal certainty and, consequently, the need for the certainty of law that it entails. It would involve the acts and conduct carried out by colleagues (registered before the Bar Association of the Province of Buenos Aires and the Bar Association of the Federal Capital), notaries, and officials of State Agencies (Judiciary, I.G.J., etc.).

Clarification: Citations of Doctrine, Case Law, and related comments are made for the purposes of making a public presentation of this document. Although the pertinent documentation has been scanned (simple copies from the parties and certified copies that were duly requested for this purpose), it has not yet been published, giving priority to the provisions of article 18 of the Code of Professional Ethics.

II.- Related Judicial Cases

A) "INDUSTRIAS MARCATI S.C.A. C/ MARCATI, GUIDO S/ SUCESIÓN S/ PRESCRIPCIÓN ADQUISITIVA" (Filing No.: 123332. Case No. 60261) — the defendant is, in fact, the estate of Gildo Marcati. On several occasions I have tried to cross-check them without success. Last order dated: April 10, 2013. On May 14, 2013, I requested that appropriate and congruent diligences be carried out to search for the proceedings, leaving a note in the book enabled on February 8, 2013, by _______________. Senior Clerk — and the incidental proceedings related to it: "INDUSTRIAS MARCATI S.C.A S/ BENEFICIO DE LITIGAR SIN GASTOS" (Filing No.: 65370. Case No.: 60262) — Withdrawal from paralysis requested on dates: September 28, 2011 and May 14, 2013 — and "INDUSTRIAS MARCATI S.C.A. S/ BENEFICIO LITIGAR S/GASTOS S/ INCIDENTE APELACIÓN" (Case No.: 76252. Start Date: May 30, 2008) — Search requested on dates: September 30, 2011 and May 14, 2013 —. All processed before the Court of First Instance in Civil and Commercial Matters number fourteen (14), Single Secretariat, of the Judicial Department of Lomas de Zamora.

B) "MARCATI ELVIRA C/ FABRIS JOSE LUIS Y OT. S/ REIVINDICACIÓN (2)" (Filing No.: 19121. Case No. 80098 of the Court of First Instance in Civil and Commercial Matters number 10, Single Secretariat, of the Judicial Department of Lomas de Zamora). Current Case No. 85621, processed before the Court of First Instance in Civil and Commercial Matters number 14, Single Secretariat, of the same judicial department. According to records from the computer system called "Virtual Filing Desk", they were received by the court on November 21, 2012. Since I have been unable to cross-check them on several occasions, I have requested, in the same brief submitted in relation to File No. 60261 (dated May 14, 2013), that appropriate and congruent diligences be carried out for their search. Leaving a note in the attendance book, on the same date.

C) "MARCATI ELVIRA C/ OCUPANTES CALLE GIRIBONE 574/551 S/ Diligencia Preliminar (166) (reservado de Secretaría)" (Filing No.: 25817. Case No. 78986), processed before the Court of First Instance in Civil and Commercial Matters number 10, Single Secretariat, of the Judicial Department of Lomas de Zamora.

D) "MARCATI GILDO S/ SUCESIÓN AB-INTESTATO" (Filing No.: 86560. Case No. 40615) and the incidental proceedings related to it: "MARCATI GILDO S/ SUCESIÓN S/ INC. ART. 760 CPCC" (Filing No.: 650. Case No. 64932) and "MARCATI GILDO S/ SUCESIÓN S/ EXPEDIENTE DE ADMINISTRACIÓN" (Filing No.: 1450. Case No. 65308). All processed before the Court of First Instance in Civil and Commercial Matters number 2, Single Secretariat, of the Judicial Department of San Isidro.

III.- Reasons for the delay

a) Some, of uncertain origin, occurred before and after the submission of my resignation as legal counsel for the party: They will be disclosed in detail when ratifying this document; but it is anticipated that, among them, is having received a gunshot wound, on September 17, 2007, which hit my left arm — criminal case processed before the U.F.I. No. 10 of the Judicial Department of San Martín —. A digitized copy of the statement made before the San Martín 2nd Police Station, Province of Buenos Aires, is attached in the file declaracion_testimonial_17-09-2007.pdf (the complainant possesses the original document).

b) Personal: Completion of a grieving process, due to the death, on August 14, 2009, of my father.

c) Work-related: The alleged lack of record of irregularities and/or anomalies, in various judicial proceedings that were processed before the Judicial Department of San Martín, under the legal counsel of the complainant, according to what would objectively arise from their cross-checking — ignorance of procedural, substantive and regulatory rules, as well as the logical principle of "non-contradiction", by the intervening officials and magistrates — and the possible lack of due attention — search for the objective legal truth of the matter — in the complaints filed in this regard in criminal, administrative venues — note formulated under the terms of Agreement No. 3354 SCBA — and before the Commission for the Administration of Justice, San Martín headquarters, of the Bar Association — filed on April 8, 2009 and September 20, 2010 —. All this occurred during the period: December 2008 / December 2010.

IV.- Accompanying documentation and related facts

1º) Through the attached file constancia_inscripcion_CUIT_30-69776966-4.pdf, a digitized copy of a REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE (Valid from May 11, 2013 to November 7, 2013) of INDUSTRIAS MARCATI SOC EN COMANDITA POR ACCIONES (Tax ID: 30-69776966-4) is attached. It indicates, as the start date of the main activity: 369999 (F-150), the month March 1999. This indicates, according to the AFIP, the start of activity in the premises or establishment. This date is relevant, because the statement of claim for adverse possession (pp. 230/232 of Filing No.: 123332), was submitted on November 3, 1999.

When answering a transfer ordered in Filing No.: 19121 —vindication process—, it had already been stated that, from similar documentation, only recent registrations emerged (section VI, subsection B of the brief submitted on February 24, 2006, before the Secretariat of Court number 10). It is known to us that the period necessary to acquire ownership by acquisitive prescription is 20 years (Arts. 4015 and 4016 of the Civil Code); a much shorter one would be verified.

Case Law teaches in this regard: "The adverse possessor must reliably accredit the extremes of their action, and among them when they began to possess for themselves, in order to be able to consider the legal term fulfilled." SCBA, Ac 33628 S 5-3-1985, Judge NEGRI (SD). CAPTION: Vinent, Pablo c/ Piñeiro de Amette, María Luisa y otros s/ Prescripción veinteañal. PUBLICATIONS: AyS 1985-I-237 - JA 1985-IV, 174 - LL 1985-D, 11 - DJBA 1985-129, 706. VOTING MAG.: Negri - San Martín - Mercader - Rodríguez Villar - Salas. Court of origin: CC0101LP.

2º) The file demanda_de_usucapion.pdf contains a digitized copy of the adverse possession lawsuit filed on November 3, 1999, by the attorney-in-fact of the person who invoked the capacity of liquidator of Industrias Marcati S.C.A. (pp. 230/232 of Filing No.: 123332, of Court number 14). The complainant possesses certified copies of said documentation.

3º) The file Boletín_Oficial_29188.pdf contains a digitized copy of the Official Gazette No. 29,188, 2nd Section, of Friday, July 16, 1999 (Page 16). A copy of it can be purchased at the various offices of the Official Gazette of the Argentine Republic. The publication states that: "The National Court of First Instance in Commercial Matters No. 10, temporarily in charge of Dr. Miguel F. Bargalló, Secretariat No. 19, temporarily in charge of the undersigned, located at Callao 635, 1st floor, Federal Capital, communicates for five days that on June 16, 1999 the bankruptcy of: 'INDUSTRIAS MARCATI S.A.' has been decreed...". The same information can be found in the OFFICIAL GAZETTE No. 29,189, 2nd Section, p. 40 (of Monday, July 19, 1999). According to what is indicated (exposed in the vindication lawsuit —demanda_de_reivindicación.pdf— and recognized by the person who appeared to answer it) one could ask: What was the location of the establishment in which "Industrias Marcati S.A." (corporation) carried out its main activity?. The answer would be found in the report produced by the Renar, offered by the plaintiff, in Filing No.: 123332 —adverse possession process—, dated March 22, 2001 —informe_renar.pdf—. It emerges from it that, "... 'Industrias Marcati Sociedad Anónima' with reported address at Giribone 551 street, Avellaneda, Province of Buenos Aires, is registered as a Legitimate Commercial User of Firearms in file No. 9730434, being authorized for the Manufacture of Conditional Civil Use Weapons...". It is also mentioned that the creation of RENAR is a consequence of the issuance of Decree 395 of the year 1975 and a copy of the Decree of the year 1954 is attached by which Industrias Marcati is authorized to act as a weapons manufacturer" (no corporate name is specified).

In this regard, it should be noted that the bylaws of "Industrias Marcati S.C.A.", executed by deed number 860, were entered into in the city of La Plata, on December 12, 1961 (according to what emerges from a request for reports requested —the complainant possesses a copy— in relation to File —I.G.J.— No. 278645/16435). It is also observed that the only registered statutory documentation existing in the Agency, provided by its Registry Department, as of that date —August 25, 2006— is its incorporation.

Certain concerns arise: If the Corporation, with reported address at Giribone 551 street, was dedicated to the manufacture of weapons until its bankruptcy was decreed in June 1999, did the S.C.A. develop any activity in that period?, what was it and where was it carried out?. Did the S.C.A. perform acts typical of its purpose, in that period (Article two of its bylaws)?; was there a supervening impossibility to achieve it?. Was it registered as a commercial user in RENAR, prior to the year 2005?. Did it have employees in a dependency relationship, prior to the year 2007? It should also be borne in mind, the date of death of Don Gildo Marcati —November 12, 1990—, sole registered general partner, according to what emerges from a report issued by a legal qualifying inspector —I.G.J.— dated March 6, 2006 (it was accompanied with the presentation made on April 21, 2006, in the incidental proceeding of the estate —Filing No. 650—; a digitized copy of it is attached —informe_inspectora_calificadora_legal.pdf—). Likewise, it is reported that the complainant possesses a certified copy of the documentation.

Case Law points out in this regard: "The absolute paralysis of the company opens the ways of dissolution based on the LSC, article 94, subsection 4... As a consequence of the interdependence between the concepts of legal personality and activity, if the latter is lacking, the entity remains only in its form, definitively losing the reason for being that the law had in mind when granting it its existence. On the other hand, if certain circumstances prevent the further fulfillment of the productive or exchange activity of the entity, it lacks cause and its dissolution corresponds. Finally, the law cannot fulfill its object if there is an impossibility of functioning of the corporate bodies" (Repun, Mario c/ Beri, Vicente, CNCom., Chamber D, 20-II-84. Source: "COMMERCIAL COMPANIES LAW", Garrone, José A.; Castro Sammartino, Mario. SECTION XII - Partial resolution and dissolution. Case Law 11. PARTIAL RESOLUTION. DISSOLUTION. 11.2. DISSOLUTION. Publisher: Abeledo Perrot. Edition: 1997).

4º) poder_general_judicial_escritura_numero_cincuenta_y_nueve.pdf, contains a digitized copy of the copy of the General Judicial Power of Attorney, deed number 59, granted on January 20, 1999 (the complainant possesses a certified copy of the documentation), submitted with the initial brief of the adverse possession lawsuit —Filing No.: 123332— as well as at the time of answering the vindication lawsuit —Filing No.: 19121—. The content of said instrument, as well as the statements made in the adverse possession lawsuit (file demanda_de_usucapion.pdf), can be related to the publication made in the Official Gazette, on June 18, 1981, 2nd Section, Page 3, "INDUSTRIAS MARCATI SOCIEDAD ANÓNIMA" (full director of the Corporation). As well as, with the documentation on pp. 19/22 and the presentation on p. 28 of the estate file (Filing No. 86560. Case No. 40615). On the other hand, a probable lack of legal or necessary representation (Arts. 33, 35 and 36 of the Civil Code) of the person who appeared in the capacity of liquidator of "Industrias Marcati S.C.A." must be pointed out and, as a consequence, the lack of legitimation of their attorneys-in-fact (argument exposed in the presentation made on February 24, 2006 in Filing No.: 19121 —opone_falta_legitimacion_contesta_excepcion.pdf—). This would emerge from the lack of registration of the liquidator (according to what emerges from the report on p. 546 of Filing No.: 123332 —produced by the I.G.J.—, on October 7, 2005 —informe_IGJ_07-10-2005.pdf—, accompanied in copy, to the presentation made in the incidental proceeding of the estate —Filing No.: 650— on April 21, 2006). It should be noted that, as of the date of such meeting —June 24, 1997—, more than 6 (six) years had elapsed, since the death of the sole general partner —November 12, 1990— (some details of that meeting are unknown).

5º) In the course of the proceedings, it has become known that "Industrias Marcati S.C.A." turned out to be the registered owner of the adjoining property —Giribone 539 —to the object of adverse possession —Giribone 551—. Its registered ownership emerges from the copy of the title report attached —Informe_de_dominio.pdf—. It was attached to the brief submitted before the Secretariat of the Court of First Instance in Civil and Commercial Matters No. 2, of the Judicial Department of San Isidro (Filing No.: 86560 —estate process—), on August 22, 2005 —presentacion_22_agosto_2005.pdf—. A Provisional Registration of Sale emerges from Entry 3 of the report. Likewise, it should be noted that two forms corresponding to said property would have been submitted in the proceedings —Filing No.: 123332—, as evidence externalizing the "animus domini" of the adverse possessor, reiterating that it was not the one that was the object of the adverse possession process —Giribone 551—. This emerges from the documentation on pp. 444/445 of those proceedings. And it was reported through a presentation made before the Secretariat of the Court of First Instance in Civil and Commercial Matters No. 14, on March 4, 2005 —impugna_documental.pdf—. In the estate process, reference was also made to said property, through a presentation dated August 22, 2005 —presentacion_22_agosto_2005.pdf—.

6º) mandamientos.pdf; contesta_traslado_camara.pdf; dictamen_profesional.pdf; cesion_legataria.pdf and cesion_cesionario.pdf; contain copies of: a) The verification warrants carried out in Filing No.: 25817 —Preliminary Diligence—, on dates February 10, 2005, March 21, 2005, April 28, 2005 and May 24, 2005 (Accompanied in copy, to the presentation made in the incidental proceeding of the estate —Filing No.: 650 — on April 21, 2006). The complainant possesses certified copies of them; b) The answer to the transfer of the documentation submitted before Chamber I, of the Hon. Chamber of Appeals in Civil and Commercial Matters of the Judicial Department of Lomas de Zamora, through which reference is made to the characteristics of it; c) A professional opinion (Res No.2/87) dated June 2, 2004. The complainant possesses a certified copy of it; d) Assignment of rights, deed no. 118; and e) Assignment of rights, deed no. 253.

Regarding the contract of assignment of rights, Legal Doctrine has stated: "A characteristic of this contract is that the assignor continues to be an heir, just as in Roman law, which consecrated the rule 'Semel heres semper heres'. The quality of heir, whether legitimate or testamentary, cannot be the object of assignment because it is strictly personal." "COURSE OF SUCCESSION LAW", Pérez Lasala, José Luis (author); Pérez Lasala, Fernando (collab.). Chapter XVIII - "CONTRACT OF ASSIGNMENT OF INHERITANCE". 334. Concept and characters. Publisher: Abeledo Perrot. Edition: 2007 (9206/006142). It being possible to add that, even with the particularity of the assignment of the quota regarding the mode of transmission, the assignment does not transfer to the assignee the quality of heir.

Furthermore, Legal Doctrine points out: "The death of a partner produces different effects depending on the type of company in question: (i) in general partnerships, in limited partnerships and in partnerships limited by shares regarding the general partners (cfr. Zunino, J.O., Dissolution and Liquidation, Vol. I, Astrea, Buenos Aires, 1984, p. 390): the death of a partner partially resolves the corporate contract, and the entry of the heirs may be stipulated, who join it without the need for a new contract and are only empowered to condition their incorporation to the transformation of their share into a limited one; … The valuation of the share of which the deceased was the holder must be carried out according to a special balance sheet as of the date of death, including the values of goodwill and the going concern." "COMMERCIAL COMPANIES LAW", Garrone, José A.; Castro Sammartino, Mario. SECTION XII - Partial resolution and dissolution. Death of a partner. Publisher: Abeledo Perrot. Edition: 1997 (1605/001176).

Regarding the evidentiary efficacy that public instruments bring by themselves, it must be borne in mind that the instrument itself should not be confused with the business it validates (materially fulfilled facts passed in the presence of the notary —art. 993 Civil Code—). Likewise, that the bylaws of "Industrias Marcati S.C.A." (according to what emerges from the report —I.G.J.— produced on August 25, 2006), do not stipulate the entry of the heirs upon the death of the general partner.

The manifest inaccuracies (according to the specialized rule and doctrine) in the accompanying documentation, would suggest the application of the following Case Law: "If absolute nullity is manifest, it can be declared ex officio by the judges" (arts. 1038, 1047 and concordant, of the Civil Code). CCI Art. 1038 ; CCI Art. 1047 | SCBA, AC 69636 S 12-15-1999 , Judge LABORDE (SD) | CAPTION: Forneris, Néstor Hugo s/ Incidente de desembargo en autos principales "Banco de Crédito Argentino S.A. c/Chichilliti, María Cristina y Forneris, Néstor Hugo s/ Ejecución hipotecaria"; VOTING MAG.: Laborde - de Lázzari - Pettigiani - Pisano - Hitters; COURT OF ORIGIN: CC0000JU.

7º) The municipal enabling file for the establishment located at Tte. Cnel. José P. Giribone 551 street, would be the one corresponding to number 4004/6930/04, of July 22, 2004 (This emerges from a personal note, it must be verified).

8º) It must be borne in mind, that corporations, partnerships limited by shares and mixed economy companies, must issue their shares, as prescribed by article 211 of the Commercial Companies Law 19,550, according to what emerges from the report produced —National Securities Commission— on February 2, 2006, on pp. 17/18 of the incidental proceeding of the estate —Filing No.: 650—, as of the indicated date, "... the company 'Industrias Marcati S.C.A.' is not registered in the Public Offering regime." —informe_comision_valores.pdf—.

9º) Digitized copies of the fee agreement entered into with my client —convenio_honorarios.pdf—, of the certified letter sent to him —CD766885350.pdf— at the time of submitting my resignation in the proceedings. And of some presentations made by the attorney who continued the legal representation of the client —presentacion_28-02-2007.pdf; presentacion_11-04-2008.pdf; presentacion_18-04-2008.pdf—.

10º) In the proceedings, the exercise of the professional activity was fulfilled, with a license being suspended, since the month of September 1993, according to what emerges from the report on p. 545, dated August 4, 2005, Filing No.: 123332 —adverse possession process—.

11º) I do not know if any of the facts denounced have any connection with the circumstances that occurred before and after the submission of my resignation as legal counsel, with special emphasis on the gunshot wound, dated September 17, 2007.

V.- Final Reflection

Practicing law, as well as the magistracy, is investigating, in order to aim to reach the objective legal truth of the case. In this task, a colleague, registered in the Bar Association of the Federal Capital, collaborated in due course (verification warrants, complaints and action before RENAR and the General Inspection of Justice; and request for reports before the National Securities Commission).

Fear has always been used as a weapon of domination; its function in social life and within organizations is well known: Trying to dominate and force the citizen to renounce their rights. In the same way, to prevent the fulfillment of our civic and moral obligations. Fortunately, we can mitigate and control its effects, as well as those that come from the different symptoms, indicative of "groupthink". Finally, I would like to emphasize that, in no way, do I possess an "unquestionable belief" in the inherent morality of a certain organization or group of individuals. The facts described have collaborated in the formation of that thought, deepening it.

Without further ado, awaiting your response, I respectfully greet you,

Jorge Verón Schenone, attorney, T° XXXII F° 204 of the C.A.S.I., in compliance with articles 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 of the Code of Professional Ethics, states:

I.- That on May 24, 2013 he sent two copies of this document (in digital .doc format), together with most of the attached files indicated in the text (in .pdf format), to the Bar Association of San Isidro (email addresses: denuncias@casi.com.ar and consejo@casi.com.ar —after a telephone confirmation—). And on May 29, 2013 the files were sent: cesion_legataria.pdf; cesion_cesionario.pdf; presentacion_11-04-2008.pdf; presentacion_18-04-2008.pdf; informe_comision_valores.pdf; informe_IGJ_07-10-2005.pdf and informe_renar.pdf (to the email address: consejo@casi.com.ar).

II.- Likewise, on May 29, 2013 (6:00 pm), the complaint formulated in writing was submitted, together with the cited documentation, on paper support (in a total of 69 —sixty-nine— pages) and on digital storage support, .pdf format (accompanied on a CDROM).

Without further ado, awaiting your response, I respectfully greet you,

To the Mr. President of the Bar Association of San Isidro,
Dr. Antonio E. Carabio.

Most respectfully:

I am pleased to address you, in my capacity as an attorney, registered at T° XXXII F° 204 of the C.A.S.I., in compliance with articles 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 of the Code of Professional Ethics, and Art. 47 of Law 5177, in order to ratify by means of this note, the complaint filed on May 29, 2013, in relation to the possible commission of certain acts and conduct in which public order has a significant interest and others that specifically relate to the professional technical capacity required to hold public office and practice law, of which I have become aware during my professional practice, linked to the Administration of Justice of the Province of Buenos Aires and National State Agencies.

Making myself available to explain, detail and expand on the facts denounced therein, as well as those stated in section III of the same, particularly regarding what is stated in subsection c).

Without further ado, awaiting your response, I respectfully greet you,